The Court Room · for Mike and Adam

How the Summons gets built and mailed

Everything below is already decided. This is the walkthrough of what goes on the paper, why it is built that way, and the four things still standing between us and a print run.

The short version

Each person gets a mailed Summons on heavy stock with their own number printed on it. That number plus the email we sent the notice to is how they claim their seat online. Once they are in, they set a password and the number stops being a login.

What you need for the printer is a spreadsheet with four columns, and one of those columns does not exist yet. That is the whole holdup, and it is a decision rather than a build.


What is printed on the paper

A three digit jury number, zero padded. Not a word code like the Grand Jury has today.

007

This is the whole code. It is short on purpose: it gets read aloud at the door, typed on a phone, and printed on a card. WITNESS-964 is fine to text somebody, and miserable to read off a letter in a dark lounge.

The number is also the member's identity inside the club from that point on. It goes on the membership card, it is how a bar tab gets matched to the right person, and it is the thing a host sees at check in. It is not a temporary activation code that gets thrown away.

Why we are dropping the word codes

The Grand Jury logs in today with a word and a number: WITNESS-964, BAILIFF-707. Those were the right call for what they were built for, and the wrong one for what comes next.

The problem is not the format, it is that the code is the whole login. One string, printed on paper, and whoever reads it is inside. Nothing else is asked for.

The same three questions, both ways
Word code todayNumber and email
Somebody photographs the letter They are in They still need the email it was issued to
The code leaks Reprint the letter or the card. There is no reset Reset the password by email, like anything else
What it opens A nomination form Lockers, guest history, running notes, a card on file

That last row is the real argument. The same style of credential that was fine for a nomination form is now the front door to a member's locker contents and their card on file. The room behind the door got much bigger, so the door had to change.

There is a practical side too. Generating a hundred and thirty unique memorable word codes invites collisions and misreads, and these get read aloud at a door and typed on a phone. WITNESS against WITNESSES, a zero against an O. A three digit number has none of that.

And a number can do a second job a code never could. Because it is not the secret, it is safe to print on the membership card and say out loud, which is what lets it be the thing a host recognises at check in and the thing a bar tab gets matched to.

Nobody gets locked out

Existing Grand Jury codes keep working. They are not being switched off to make this happen, so no seated juror loses access partway through.


Why the number alone is not enough to log in

Because a piece of paper can be photographed, and because the numbers run in sequence. If 007 alone opened an account, then 008 and 009 do too, and anyone who sees one Summons can guess the rest.

So claiming a seat needs the number and the email address we mailed the notice to, and both have to match the same person. After that the member sets their own password, and from then on the login is email and password like anything else. The number retires from being a credential and stays as their number.

Worth knowing

When someone gets it wrong, the site says the same thing whether the number does not exist, the email does not match, or the seat was already claimed. That is deliberate. A more helpful error message would tell a stranger which numbers are real.


Where the numbers come from

They are assigned by hand from a list, never generated. The bands are set:

Number bands
RangeWhoCapacity
001–199Founding members199
200–299Jury Members100
300–399National members100
400–499Councilors100
500–599Honorary members100
600–699Test accounts, never a real person

Founding started at 100 and was widened to 199 on August 14, because there are 35 seated jurors and the docket carries over 100 jury tier nominees. At any sensible approval rate, 100 numbers would not have covered it.

Jury Members sit second, directly after Founding. That is new as of August 17. Founding absorbs everyone the docket approves, so the post opening Jury tier had no numbers of its own. Giving it 200 to 299 pushes National and Councilor each down one band, and Councilor lands on the 400s, which is exactly what that block was being held back for. Honorary and test accounts do not move.

One consequence

Every number from 001 to 699 now belongs to a tier, so there is no spare block left in the middle. A tier invented later starts at 700 rather than slotting in between. That is a fine trade for having Jury Members numbered at all, and worth knowing before anyone proposes a fifth membership type.

The one that matters at the printer

Numbers freeze the moment they are printed. There is no renumbering afterward, because the number is on the card, in the tab history, and in the member's head. So the list that goes to the printer is the list forever. That is the reason we are being fussy about the bands before anything gets set in ink.


The order this happens in

  1. 01

    Docket review closes

    August 31 · automatic

    The bench stops reviewing. Nominations close the same night, so the list stops moving.

  2. 02

    You and Adam make the final calls

    Mike and Adam

    Working from the bench's sidebar notes. Nothing is approved yet, so today every name on the docket is still pending. This step is what turns a nomination into a member.

  3. 03

    Numbers get assigned to the approved list

    Keegan, from your approvals

    One pass, by hand, into the bands above. The tool refuses the whole run rather than guessing if it hits an ambiguous name, a duplicate, a reserved number, or somebody who already holds a different one.

  4. 04

    The printer sheet goes over

    Keegan to the printer

    Four columns, one row per person. Deduped, so nobody nominated twice gets two letters.

  5. 05

    Letters mail, and an email goes out the same day

    Production in house

    The paper is the real experience. The email is a heads up to the same address that is half their login, and it carries a confirm you saw this button so nobody can say the letter never arrived.

  6. 06

    Fourteen days to accept

    The member

    Worded as a request, not a threat. Anyone who has not responded gets the electronic version as a fallback, which is also the answer for travellers and bad addresses.

National and Councilor summonses go out after opening and carry an initiation fee, per your call on July 29. Founding goes first and on its own.


What the printer actually receives

One row per approved member
ColumnWhere it comes fromReady?
NameThe nominationAll 134 have one
EmailThe nomination form required itAll 134 have one
Mailing addressThe nomination131 of 134 are mailable
Jury numberAssigned at step 03None assigned yet

The docket currently holds 134 nominations: 111 jury, 13 councilor, 10 national. A few people were put forward by more than one juror, so the mailing list is slightly shorter than the nomination count once it is deduped.


Three things standing in the way

None of these are build work. One is a decision, one is timing, one is data collection.

Settled August 17, no longer blocking

Jury Members now have a band

They sit at 200 to 299, second after Founding, with National and Councilor each moved down one. This was the open question and it is closed, so nothing is waiting on it. Flag it now if you want the order different, because it is free to change today and frozen once the first Summons prints.

1 · Blocked on step 02

Nothing is approved yet

All 134 nominations are still pending, which is correct for today. But numbers cannot be assigned to a list that does not exist yet, so the print run starts the day after you and Adam finish the final calls.

2 · Collection job, and it is bigger than it looks

31 of the existing Grand Jury have no email on file

The original rollout ran by text off a spreadsheet, so most of the seated jurors have a phone number and nothing else. Email is half the login, so a juror without one cannot claim their account at all. They are being onboarded in person anyway, which is the moment to collect it, but it needs to happen before their Summons is worth mailing.

3 · Three addresses, fixable at print time

Not enough address to mail

  • Davis Sezna National lists two states rather than a street. Goes out after opening anyway, so there is time.
  • Jacob Cook has a street name with no number or city.
  • Steve Lucey has a city and state with no street.

Everyone else is mailable. Chasing the whole bench for address confirmation is not needed, which was the worry on July 29 and turned out not to be a real problem.


What we need from you

Everything else is already built and waiting. The claim page, the number and email check, the password step and the six step onboarding wizard behind it are all live.